Special Issue: Feminist Engagements in Other PlacesNovember 2007Lyn Parker and Laura Dales (Guest Editors) This issue of Outskirts has its origin in a discussion prompted by Maria Jaschok’s paper at the 2006 Australian Women’s Studies Association Conference in Melbourne. Maria’s paper – a revised version of which introduces this issue – examines some of the theoretical and practical implications of ethnographic collaboration in feminist research in “Other places”. Maria explores the tensions and rewards of collaborative research with women in the Hui Chinese Muslim community, and argues that it is in its “border crossing” that such research is fraught but potentially highly productive. The editors were encouraged to think about their own experiences as feminists conducting cross-cultural fieldwork. Our aim in this issue has been to explore the implications of feminist analyses for the women who feature in the studies, and for the researchers and feminist theories that drive analyses. The papers in this issue address the challenges and ambiguities of feminist research conducted outside the researcher’s (literal as well as metaphoric) “home” and reveal the opportunities for reflection, reconsideration and innovation that can result from feminist engagement in “Other Places”. Susanne Gannon uses her own work on three writing projects to demonstrate how fictional, collective and other performative textual practices might be taken up to write the 'others' of our research, including ourselves, other/wise in academia. In her paper on imagining faith-based feminism within Islam, Lyn Parker uses critical autobiography and ethnography to show how she has come to understand and value faith-based feminism in her work on Indonesian women. Laura Dales’s paper discusses the ways in which feminist theory influenced her fieldwork in Japan and examines the impacts of self – particularly age, “race” and language – on the process and outcomes of feminist research. Virginia Mapedzahama’s paper discusses the difficulties of negotiating insider/outsider positions in Australian and African research sites, and reflects on the challenges she experienced in her positioning as a non-western, black woman researching white women in Australia and black women in Zimbabwe. Finally, Victoria Loblay considers the diversity of “internationalisms”, focusing on the campaign against the Anti-Fertility Vaccine, and drawing on her own experiences travelling between feminisms in Australia and India. Her paper examines some of the obstacles to synchronisation of feminisms in the field of women’s health politics. |